Sadly, They Probably Will.
I found this particularly depressing. It would seem that if a "hero" of one's consideration is arrested that is cause for selective targeting of abusers rather than a broad condemnation of any single individual or organisation. Gambaccini, by his own admission, chose not to expose Savile's creepy and ghastly abuse of children. Make of that what you will. Others have condemned the managers and BBC corporate heads in charge.
As this historical collusion for the entrapment of innocents grew to a casual activity tolerated by all and sundry, those guilty of allowing those involved to ply their despicable "hobby " are readily able to continue to keep many secrets under wraps. For John Ward to imply that of all those coming forward now to relate the horrors experienced are "gold diggers" is a dreadful stance to take. A stance then employed to argue only politicians, especially Tory, are somehow more guilty than those in the BBC is a hard argument to accept.
Paedophiles are gregarious for some reason best known to themselves. Abuse, notably the Asian grooming gangs, seems to be something these hateful and cretinous creatures relish. Thus I feel confident that Savile and the many "aides" employed by the creep, frequently met and gathered in places their political like minded scum chose to indulge their own nastiness against children.
We, as a Nation, appear infected by the prevalence of our home grown clutches of pederasts as well as those we have happily imported. If but one centre of this control freakery cabal of freaks can be brought to book, one guilty of biased thinking in many areas, then I for one would welcome it. Not least if the arrogant smugness of them all was used to expose their counterparts throughout Whitehall, Westminster and anywhere else these people, these inadequates, favour.